PP tiles lift off easily — they are not bonded to the base, so removal is clean and non-destructive. Acrylic requires grinding or an overlay if you want to change. EPDM is permanent once cured. This is the main reason we recommend PP tiles when there is any uncertainty about long-term use.

PP tiles drain fastest — water passes through the gaps between tiles and off the court. Acrylic needs a properly sloped base (1-2%) to shed water; pooling will shorten its lifespan. EPDM is slip-resistant but holds water on the surface longer than PP tiles. All three work in Indian weather when installed correctly.

PP tiles last 15+ years and carry a 5-year manufacturer warranty. EPDM lasts 10-15 years before the binder begins to degrade. Acrylic lasts 5-7 years before recoating is needed — but recoating is significantly cheaper than replacing the base, so total lifetime cost is lower than it appears.

Yes. We have installed acrylic on basketball courts and PP tiles on adjacent badminton courts in the same facility. Different sports have different technical requirements, and mixing surfaces is a practical solution for multi-sport complexes.

We do not install synthetic turf. It is a different product category designed for football, cricket, and grass-sport simulations. For hard courts — basketball, badminton, volleyball, pickleball — PP tiles, acrylic, and EPDM cover every requirement.

EPDM offers the best shock absorption and is the safest surface for falls — designed specifically for children's areas and recreational use. PP tiles provide moderate cushioning through the gap structure between tiles. Acrylic is the hardest of the three; it transfers more impact to joints, so proper footwear matters more on this surface.